Posts Tagged ‘bonds’

No One Cut the Cheese, But It Still Smells

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Wall Street seems to be rolling in money again; everyone pats themselves on the back as one year removed from total financial disaster everything is now going to be alright!  As Bill Cosby used to say in his schtick, RRrighttt!

It may be less worse (sic) than it used to be, but much trouble still looms in the global economy, and as the center of the economic universe (at least presently) The USA has a long ways to go to be bailing out the rest of the planet.

An overly optimistic view of supply side economics, and it’s inherent flaws in the very real world of high unemployment, will, at some point, give Wall Street a wake up call. The reduced expenses (through attrition and layoffs) that many companies have are showing up in profits, but not in top line revenue growth. And even if sales of products and services increases, the companies will need to rehire workers to keep up with new demand, even with the substantial productivity gains that US companies have enjoyed throughout the last two decades.

This will dampen profit growth, as demand will remain slower than in past recoveries, and the increased cost of labor will offset any real top line revenue growth.

There are at least 2 more years of a slow economy, in this authors view, due to the extreme amount of global debt, both governmental, and personal, that must be unwound, repriced, repaid, or otherwise written off. Add to that the aging of the Baby-Boomers, and their reduced need for more new “things” and you have a formula for slow economic recovery, in spite of rising middle class populations in China and India.

I recently had a discussion with a Phoenix, Arizona business man. He runs a commercial real estate moving company. He is busier than he has been in years! This sounds like a good economic indicator, doesn’t it? But here is what is happening: companies are downsizing, or going out of business, and they need to move to lower cost, smaller spaces, or just put their furniture  and office equipment in storage, hoping that they can find a brighter day sometime soon. He said my office full of furniture, a pretty nice L-shaped desk and matching file cabinets, could be bought for$100 today. There is that much used (and quality) office furniture out there, so supply far out-strips demand.

We are preaching caution to our investors. Do not be afraid to lock in 2009 profits (it is NEVER wrong to take a profit), and look for new opportunities to buy stocks and bonds when the yields rise (prices drop). Buy residential real estate and other hard assets below replacement costs, wait for economic recovery to take place, and reap the reward of future inflation when it arrives (it will arrive again).

About the Author:

Roger P. Simard, CFP® is the principal of Genesis Financial Advisors, LLC an Arizona Investment Advisory firm. You can view the firms most recent quarterly portfolio performance at http://www.genfinre.com/Download.html

The Failure of Modern Portfolio Theory

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Modern Portfolio Theory, as brought to you by the Pulitzer Prize winning Harry Markowitz, was originally published in 1952.  With later additions by Merton Miller and William Sharpe, its technical market analysis and risk adjusted return theories remain just that, theory, not fact.

The theory is followed, to one degree or another, by most investment professionals.

According to the theory, investors are risk adverse: they are willing to accept more risk (volatility) for higher payoffs and will accept lower returns for a less volatile investment. The theory is simple and elegant, and can lead further into various mathematical proofs and equations, which probably has a lot to do with why it has become so widely accepted.

If you have checked your returns lately, the risk adjusted return your portfolio incurred based on these theories has left you, should we say, wanting.

In this writer’s opinion and experience, cash flow is the driving force in any asset classes’ success or failure. Just watch the markets for one week, and see how the tide turns from one asset class to another based on yields vs. profits (or perceived future profits).

So let’s skip the major formulaic crap and cut to the chase. No, in fact, let’s give up the chase. Chasing perceived multiples, chasing past performance, trusting our corporate institutions to grow larger and larger profits (at any cost), and turn to the truth of what really drives the value of a given asset.

And really, what is it that you, the everyday investor are looking for in your portfolio? We’ll get to more on that later.

Let’s say I own a company that makes widget “A”. I sell these things like crazy! However, my profits are low due to poor pricing, paying too much for supplies, labor, cost overruns, etc.;  generally bad management. Of course all of these data points are going to show up in my public reports. But what is the real tale? My company has poor cash flow. The beta, Sharpe ratio, r-squared, sector, or industry while all indicators, confuse the long term issue. My company’s cash flow sucks!

Compare that with the company with widget “B” with similar sales, but better management. This also company sends you a check every now and then; from 1 to 12 times a year, because of positive cash flow, I the investor get a piece of this company’s action.

Both companies are now for sale. Which one would you pay more for? If both companies have similar outstanding debt, in that moment of purchase, a rational person would buy company B.

Did you need formulas, risk tolerance tests, or some version of portfolio selection to make that decision? Perhaps these are helpful guidelines in developing an overall portfolio, but not in that buying decision of that specific capital asset.

Now, let’s leave the world of Wall Street for a moment and turn to Main Street (such an overused cliché, let’s use your neighborhood instead). In your neighborhood, there are 2 rental homes for sale. On one block a home has a renter paying $500 month in rent. On another, the renter pays $550 per month. Both homes are otherwise identical. To receive a 6% rate of return (Cap Rate) on either house, I would have to pay more for the house that produces the bigger monthly check, i.e. the one with more cash flow holds more value.

And so it goes, with each asset class we examine. Bonds with higher yields than the current market offers sell at a premium. Commodity prices are priced based on demand, or perceived demand, which translates into how much cash flow is in the economy to allow people to want more of that “thing”.

It goes on and on, but it all boils down to the main ingredient in financial success. The “show me the money” rant, so to speak.  Cash Flow.

Now, let’s visit what it is that you are looking for to achieve financial success. Is it a large net worth? They even have advertisements showing people carrying around their “number”. I believe using “modern” or even post-modern portfolio theory is only a small part of selecting your portfolio’s asset choices.

A safer, common sense, simpler, and more systematic approach is to look to grow your cash flow, every year, and then your net worth will take care of itself. In fact it won’t even matter.

The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective. - Warren Buffett