Posts Tagged ‘portfolio theory’

Corporate Malfeasance vs. Fiduciary Standards

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

As corporate malfeasance becomes more and more obvious to the citizens of the world, your neighbor, my neighbor, the neighbor’s neighbor are all “Mad as Hell and not going to take it anymore!” How long can we all stand by while these corporate fat cats get to take huge risks without any real risk to them or their company?

I am all for free markets, but as history as shown time and again, greed can get in the way of civility. And as much as I dislike politicians trying to control more and more of our lives, we have to have someone keeping things in check.

Something floating around in the Wall Street Reform package is a standard of fiduciary behavior. The bill that emerged from the Senate Banking Committee in March calls for a Securities and Exchange Commission study on whether broker-dealers who provide investment advice should meet the same fiduciary obligation as investment advisers. An amendment written by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-New Jersey, and Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, would replace the Senate provision with one from the House bill. That provision instructs the SEC move ahead with writing a universal fiduciary standard for investment advisers and brokers giving advice.

Now a moderate Republican has entered into this hotly debated topic. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, plans to offer an amendment on fiduciary standards that could be more sweeping than a controversial proposal in a House bill passed last year.

An aide to Ms. Collins said that specific language for a specific amendment has not yet been drafted. But at two hearings last week, Ms. Collins indicated that she may favor imposing fiduciary requirements on broker dealers for both retail and institutional investors.

I strongly encourage you to write to your representatives both in the senate and the house, and tell them to pass a bill with these standards.

In case you are not familiar with Fiduciary Standards, you can read more here.

Here is my firm’s (and my personal) pledge:

1) I will always put the client’s best interest first — ahead of my own and that of my firm and its employees. As defined by federal law, I will act as a fiduciary.

2) When selecting investments, I will act as the client’s agent, seeking the best investments at the best prices at all times.

3) While neither I nor anyone can promise superior investment returns, I will provide impartial advice and act with skill, care, diligence and good judgment.

4) I will provide full and fair disclosure of all important facts, including my compensation from the providers of the products and services I offer, as well as all fees I pay to others on your behalf.

5) I will fully disclose and fairly manage, in the client’s favor, unavoidable conflicts.

Compare that with your investment advisors’ personal and corporate pledge. In fact, copy this pledge onto another document, and ask him or her to sign it. If they won’t, you should take your money and run, don’t walk, to someone who will.

About the Author:

Roger P. Simard, CFP®

Roger P. Simard is the founding principal of Genesis Financial and Real Estate Services, LLC, Genesis Financial Advisors, LLC, and Genesis Tax Advisors, LLC. He heads the firm’s corporate and personal financial planning practice and oversees all operations. Mr. Simard concentrates his work in the fields of financial planning, real estate investing, tax planning, and portfolio management. Mr. Simard is a Certified Financial Planner™ and has over 19 years of experience helping individuals and businesses achieve financial success. Mr. Simard was a speaker for The Prudential Spirit of Community Awards, a nationwide youth recognition program honoring secondary school students for outstanding service. He is a frequent speaker and radio guest on business and taxation issues and successful investment strategies and has been quoted in the Personal Real Estate Investor Magazine.

The Failure of Modern Portfolio Theory

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Modern Portfolio Theory, as brought to you by the Pulitzer Prize winning Harry Markowitz, was originally published in 1952.  With later additions by Merton Miller and William Sharpe, its technical market analysis and risk adjusted return theories remain just that, theory, not fact.

The theory is followed, to one degree or another, by most investment professionals.

According to the theory, investors are risk adverse: they are willing to accept more risk (volatility) for higher payoffs and will accept lower returns for a less volatile investment. The theory is simple and elegant, and can lead further into various mathematical proofs and equations, which probably has a lot to do with why it has become so widely accepted.

If you have checked your returns lately, the risk adjusted return your portfolio incurred based on these theories has left you, should we say, wanting.

In this writer’s opinion and experience, cash flow is the driving force in any asset classes’ success or failure. Just watch the markets for one week, and see how the tide turns from one asset class to another based on yields vs. profits (or perceived future profits).

So let’s skip the major formulaic crap and cut to the chase. No, in fact, let’s give up the chase. Chasing perceived multiples, chasing past performance, trusting our corporate institutions to grow larger and larger profits (at any cost), and turn to the truth of what really drives the value of a given asset.

And really, what is it that you, the everyday investor are looking for in your portfolio? We’ll get to more on that later.

Let’s say I own a company that makes widget “A”. I sell these things like crazy! However, my profits are low due to poor pricing, paying too much for supplies, labor, cost overruns, etc.;  generally bad management. Of course all of these data points are going to show up in my public reports. But what is the real tale? My company has poor cash flow. The beta, Sharpe ratio, r-squared, sector, or industry while all indicators, confuse the long term issue. My company’s cash flow sucks!

Compare that with the company with widget “B” with similar sales, but better management. This also company sends you a check every now and then; from 1 to 12 times a year, because of positive cash flow, I the investor get a piece of this company’s action.

Both companies are now for sale. Which one would you pay more for? If both companies have similar outstanding debt, in that moment of purchase, a rational person would buy company B.

Did you need formulas, risk tolerance tests, or some version of portfolio selection to make that decision? Perhaps these are helpful guidelines in developing an overall portfolio, but not in that buying decision of that specific capital asset.

Now, let’s leave the world of Wall Street for a moment and turn to Main Street (such an overused cliché, let’s use your neighborhood instead). In your neighborhood, there are 2 rental homes for sale. On one block a home has a renter paying $500 month in rent. On another, the renter pays $550 per month. Both homes are otherwise identical. To receive a 6% rate of return (Cap Rate) on either house, I would have to pay more for the house that produces the bigger monthly check, i.e. the one with more cash flow holds more value.

And so it goes, with each asset class we examine. Bonds with higher yields than the current market offers sell at a premium. Commodity prices are priced based on demand, or perceived demand, which translates into how much cash flow is in the economy to allow people to want more of that “thing”.

It goes on and on, but it all boils down to the main ingredient in financial success. The “show me the money” rant, so to speak.  Cash Flow.

Now, let’s visit what it is that you are looking for to achieve financial success. Is it a large net worth? They even have advertisements showing people carrying around their “number”. I believe using “modern” or even post-modern portfolio theory is only a small part of selecting your portfolio’s asset choices.

A safer, common sense, simpler, and more systematic approach is to look to grow your cash flow, every year, and then your net worth will take care of itself. In fact it won’t even matter.

The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective. - Warren Buffett