Posts Tagged ‘tax’

Corporate Malfeasance vs. Fiduciary Standards

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

As corporate malfeasance becomes more and more obvious to the citizens of the world, your neighbor, my neighbor, the neighbor’s neighbor are all “Mad as Hell and not going to take it anymore!” How long can we all stand by while these corporate fat cats get to take huge risks without any real risk to them or their company?

I am all for free markets, but as history as shown time and again, greed can get in the way of civility. And as much as I dislike politicians trying to control more and more of our lives, we have to have someone keeping things in check.

Something floating around in the Wall Street Reform package is a standard of fiduciary behavior. The bill that emerged from the Senate Banking Committee in March calls for a Securities and Exchange Commission study on whether broker-dealers who provide investment advice should meet the same fiduciary obligation as investment advisers. An amendment written by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-New Jersey, and Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, would replace the Senate provision with one from the House bill. That provision instructs the SEC move ahead with writing a universal fiduciary standard for investment advisers and brokers giving advice.

Now a moderate Republican has entered into this hotly debated topic. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, plans to offer an amendment on fiduciary standards that could be more sweeping than a controversial proposal in a House bill passed last year.

An aide to Ms. Collins said that specific language for a specific amendment has not yet been drafted. But at two hearings last week, Ms. Collins indicated that she may favor imposing fiduciary requirements on broker dealers for both retail and institutional investors.

I strongly encourage you to write to your representatives both in the senate and the house, and tell them to pass a bill with these standards.

In case you are not familiar with Fiduciary Standards, you can read more here.

Here is my firm’s (and my personal) pledge:

1) I will always put the client’s best interest first — ahead of my own and that of my firm and its employees. As defined by federal law, I will act as a fiduciary.

2) When selecting investments, I will act as the client’s agent, seeking the best investments at the best prices at all times.

3) While neither I nor anyone can promise superior investment returns, I will provide impartial advice and act with skill, care, diligence and good judgment.

4) I will provide full and fair disclosure of all important facts, including my compensation from the providers of the products and services I offer, as well as all fees I pay to others on your behalf.

5) I will fully disclose and fairly manage, in the client’s favor, unavoidable conflicts.

Compare that with your investment advisors’ personal and corporate pledge. In fact, copy this pledge onto another document, and ask him or her to sign it. If they won’t, you should take your money and run, don’t walk, to someone who will.

About the Author:

Roger P. Simard, CFP®

Roger P. Simard is the founding principal of Genesis Financial and Real Estate Services, LLC, Genesis Financial Advisors, LLC, and Genesis Tax Advisors, LLC. He heads the firm’s corporate and personal financial planning practice and oversees all operations. Mr. Simard concentrates his work in the fields of financial planning, real estate investing, tax planning, and portfolio management. Mr. Simard is a Certified Financial Planner™ and has over 19 years of experience helping individuals and businesses achieve financial success. Mr. Simard was a speaker for The Prudential Spirit of Community Awards, a nationwide youth recognition program honoring secondary school students for outstanding service. He is a frequent speaker and radio guest on business and taxation issues and successful investment strategies and has been quoted in the Personal Real Estate Investor Magazine.

IF IT WASN’T’ BAD ENOUGH ALREADY!

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Arizona Non-Recourse Lending Status to Change

On July 1st, 2009 Arizona Governor Brewer signed into law SB 1271 (a revision to ARS 33-814(g), affecting a lender’s ability to pursue a deficiency judgment post Trustee Sale, i.e. foreclosure). The exemption from deficiency resulting from sale under Trustee Sale is now clarified to be for Trustors (owners) that have occupied the home for at least 6 months, the property has received its Certificate of Occupancy, and the burden of proof is now on the owner to prove that they lived in the home for 6 months. 

The result is that any investors of non-owner occupied Arizona real estate with a loan on it that is sold at auction after September 30th, 2009 will be liable for any shortfall in the total debt owed vs. the net amount paid to the lender after auction. 

Up until now, the lender had no recourse to pursue this shortfall, but was allowed to write down the amount, take a loss against profits, and then 1099 the owner, forcing them to claim this difference between amount owed and amount collected as “income” (imputed income), and pay ordinary taxes on it.

While still an insult added to injury, at least this amount reflected a percentage of the amount, vs. owing the entire difference.

If your Arizona investment property is in foreclosure, it appears there may be a strong reason to avoid any delay in it’s Trustee Sale date. At least prior to Sept. 30th. I would strongly recommend that you consult with a credible real estate and/or bankruptcy attorney, at the very least.

Your Job Search is Tax Deductable!

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Our guest writer this week is Alex Starcevic, an Enrolled Agent with the IRS and principal of Genesis Tax Advisors.

Here are the top six things the IRS wants you to know about deducting costs related to your job search.

  1. In order to deduct job search costs, the expenses must be spent on a job search in your current occupation. You may not deduct expenses incurred while looking for a job in a new occupation.
  2. You can deduct employment and outplacement agency fees you pay while looking for a job in your present occupation. If your employer pays you back in a later year for employment agency fees, you must include the amount you receive in your gross income up to the amount of your tax benefit in the earlier year.
  3. You can deduct amounts you spend for preparing and mailing copies of a résumé to prospective employers as long as you are looking for a new job in your present occupation.
  4. If you travel to an area to look for a new job in your present occupation, you may be able to deduct travel expenses to and from the area. You can only deduct the travel expenses if the trip is primarily to look for a new job. The amount of time you spend on personal activity compared to the amount of time you spend looking for work is important in determining whether the trip is primarily personal or is primarily to look for a new job.
  5. You cannot deduct job search expenses if there was a substantial break between the end of your last job and the time you begin looking for a new one.
  6. You cannot deduct job search expenses if you are looking for a job for the first time.

If the readers have any of your own questions about payroll, taxes, accounting or bookkeeping or would like to hear about new topics each month concerning any tax, please call us at 888-902-9191 ext 205 or email at alex@genfinre.com.

You can review the June and July 2009 tax update at http://www.genfinre.com/subpage3.html